In December 2013, co-founders Alex Katter & Jack Wise set up Gravity following several years working together at management company Twenty First Artists.
Songwriters and producers Nick Atkinson, Edd Holloway & Rachel Furner sign with Gravity for management.
One of the hottest bands of 2014 choose Gravity for management.
In March of 2015, Alex Katter was nominated for Music Week’s ‘Industry Leader Campaign’.
Multi-instrumentalist, writer and producer joins the management roster.
After performing on the BBC Introducing Stage at Reading & Leeds Festival, The Amazons sign their first record deal with Fiction (Universal Music).
Little Mix release mega hit Secret Love Song ft. Jason Derulo, co-written by Rachel Furner, entering the Top 5 of the UK Singles Chart.
The Amazons release their debut single on Fiction, premiered by Zane Lowe on BBC Radio 1.
Rachel Furner co-writes the official Children In Need single ‘All We Needed' by Craig David.
The Amazons become tipped by BBC, Apple, MTV and more as the band to watch for 2017.
The Amazons are nominated as ‘Best Breakthrough Act’ at The Q Awards in London.
The Amazons achieve a Top 10 record in the UK with their debut album, produced by Catherine Marks.
The Amazons’ debut record is listed as one of the albums of the year by NME, The Telegraph and Radio X.
The community coalesced in ways corporate roadmaps rarely predict. Contributors dropped in from academia, from the disused wings of high-frequency shops, from bootcamps and philosophy forums. They argued like old friends: over memory allocation strategies, over whether a momentum filter should default to a robust estimator. Pull requests accumulated like letters from across a long city. Some submissions were technical clarifications; others were small acts of rebellion—a visualization plugin that used color to make drawdowns look like bruises, a simplified API for people who’d never written a loop in their lives. The documentation sprouted tutorials written by people who learned by doing: “If you only have an afternoon, simulate a market crash” read one. Another taught how to translate a hunch about pattern persistence into a testable hypothesis.
The download link arrived through a dozen modest avenues—an open repo, a torrent seeded by someone named after a faded constellation, a file shared in a private channel that went public with a shrug. The package was tidy: clean README, modular architecture diagrams, a readable license that tried to be generous without being naïve. “Free” meant more than price; it meant accessibility, permission to look under the hood, to learn, to appropriate. It meant a thousand novices, once intimidated by finance’s inscrutable gatekeepers, tinkering at their kitchen tables, their screens throwing up charts and stratagems at 2 a.m. quantv 3.0 free
Regulators watched with a mix of curiosity and caution. Their questions were not only technical—about systemic risk and model concentration—but philosophical: what does democratizing algorithmic markets mean for fairness, for the novice who learns and loses fast? Where transparency meets power, accountability must follow, they said. Papers were written. Hearings convened. QuantV’s maintainers answered with a blend of careful engineering notes and a humility that came from recognizing the weight of what had been unleashed. The community coalesced in ways corporate roadmaps rarely
And yet, in the joyous hum of openness, frictions revealed themselves. “Free” invited experimentation but also abuse. Forks appeared with names that smelled of opportunism—QuantV Lite, QuantV PremiumFree—repackaged with adware, behind confusing installers. Brokers whose interfaces had been scraped by hungry scripts hardened their APIs behind new rate limits. With freedom came responsibility, and the community debated its limits: Should the code enforce safe defaults that prevent easily catastrophic leverage? Should certain datasets be gated? These debates often ended in pragmatic compromise—warnings on the homepage, opt-in safety modules, an ethics guideline that read more like a manifesto than a binding contract. Pull requests accumulated like letters from across a
Market participants noticed. Ensembles trained on public data began showing up subtly in price action, their shared priors nudging market microstructures in ways both fascinating and unsettling. Strategies once idiosyncratic grew similar as accessible toolchains standardized decision-making: the same feature extraction pipelines, the same momentum definitions, the same risk-parity rebalancer. The market, in response, became both more efficient and more brittle. Correlations tightened. Drawdowns synchronized. Small, once-localized crises found easier paths to travel.
Outside markets, the story had quieter arcs. A quantitative analyst in Lagos used 3.0 to model local commodity flows, enabling better hedging for a small cooperative of farmers. A student in Prague used its visualizers to teach friends the mechanics of volatility, turning a party into an impromptu economics seminar. In these pockets, “free” carried a moral dimension—tools that lowered barriers could be vehicles for empowerment.
For practitioners, QuantV 3.0 became a mirror. It reflected both the craft and the craftiness of its users. Novices learned quickly that open tools do not replace judgment; they only amplify it. Experts discovered that their subtle advantages shrank as certain techniques entered the commons. Those who prospered were not always the brightest coders but often the ones best at framing questions: which signals matter today, how to avoid overfitting to yesterday’s noise, how to build resilience into lean systems.
